52.2% of experts who took part in our State of Link Building study find link building the most challenging part of SEO. This figure is consistent with other studies, like the poll by the Authority Hacker’s Gael Breton on X.
What makes it so difficult?
In the article, we explore 10 major link-building challenges, backed up with insights from SEOs and marketers on how to tackle them.
Let’s break this question down into two.
First, are backlinks important?
No doubt about it. Backlinks are a ranking factor, and the strength of your backlink profile has a massive impact on search engine rankings.
Don’t believe me? Check out the study by Internet Marketing Ninjas. 85% of websites ranking on Page 1 had backlinks from at least 1k domains. And 60% of them - 10k and more.
Now, the second question: can you get these links organically without actively building them?
My experience shows that it’s possible if you’re a well-established brand, like Surfer or Semrush. Such companies place much less focus on link-building, and yet, the links come anyway because of their authority.
But if you aren’t a flagship name in your niche, you need to invest in link-building if you’re serious about competing in SERPs.
So, what makes link-building so challenging? I talked to 10 SEOs, marketers, and PR professionals, and here are 10 main reasons.
The first challenge is high link-building costs. Getting quality links is expensive.
If you hire a reputable agency to manage your link-building needs, you will have to pay $50-1000+ per link, depending on your industry. And these often come in packages, so you’re looking at spending several grand a month.
Sure, you can get links for much less, for example, from link farms, but are they worth it?
Brad Russell of Digital Hitman doesn’t think so:
The alternative is building links in-house. If you go that way, you need to take into account the cost of hiring a link-builder, tool subscriptions, and outsourcing content creation. This can easily set you back by $100k+ a year and give you only a limited capacity.
And even if you run an in-house team, don’t expect the links to be free.
According to Authority Hacker, the average cost of a link in 2024 is $83.
Building links is expensive because it requires time and effort. Prospecting, content creation, finding innovative tactics and angles, personalized outreach, and tracking results all require substantial resources.
Molly Weybright of Service Direct believes it’s particularly challenging for smaller teams as they stretch themselves thin trying to cover all bases and end up in a chicken-and-egg situation:
Molly mentions the ability to create quality content as one of the limiters for link-builders.
Other experts agree that you need to create high-quality, valuable content to get links. Otherwise, why would anyone link to your website?
Creating such content is becoming increasingly difficult due to oversaturation. That’s why Brad Russell believes that creating truly ‘linkable’ content that cuts through the noise isn’t feasible for most companies.
Think about it:
How many businesses have the capacity to conduct original research that uncovers new ground, offer expert insights with a unique perspective not yet covered elsewhere, or build free tools or calculators that don’t exist yet?
Finding relevant and authoritative websites requires tons of resources as well. Especially when you’ve been doing it for a while, points out Barbara Sawala, the Head of SEO at Soul & Mind:
Evelina Milenova, the SEO Manager at Opinion Stage, adds that this is particularly challenging for smaller teams:
Why can’t you reuse the same sites?
Links from unique domains are more valuable. Two votes of confidence from two different sites mean more than two from the same one. So, if you’ve already swapped a link with a site, subsequent exchanges are less attractive.
So what’s the solution?
Let’s imagine you start with competitor analysis. Assuming you manage to replicate your competitors' links, expand your search to categories, so if you have a link from one AI writing tool’s blog, target other similar ones.
Next, Barbara recommends exploring different search angles. For example, when looking for restaurant websites, you could search for, "dog-friendly restaurants in London" or "foodie places London."
High rejection rates are another factor that makes link-building resource-intensive, according to Evelina:
Why such a high rejection rate?
Tomasz Borys, Sr VP of Marketing and Sales at Deep Sentinel, names oversaturation as the main cause:
Will Rice, the SEO & Marketing Manager at MeasureMinds, echoes that:
Will mentions two more common reasons for rejections: poor website quality and lack of relevance.
So, what can you do to increase your chances?
Invest in your website and vet your prospects more thoroughly.
Sometimes, there isn’t much you can do about it. For example, we often get turned down because of our DR. While we’re working on it constantly, it isn’t something you can improve overnight.
So, my advice? Don’t take rejections personally. It’s just business.
Attribution is one thing that complicates the lives of marketers and SEOs big time.
I mean, it’s easy to tell whether a link-building campaign was successful or not. But did it help you to achieve your business goals? Like increasing your customer base or revenue? Not so simple anymore.
One reason is that links are just one factor in the whole puzzle game, so it’s hard to tell how much impact they have on your OKRs compared to others, like on-page content optimization that you might have been doing in parallel.
Secondly, as Jason Davis points out, the results aren’t immediate:
Why does it matter?
In times of budget cuts, not being able to attribute results to link-building can undermine your leadership buy-in. This makes it challenging to secure the funding that you need to deliver links. This may further exacerbate the resource shortage discussed above.
Considering how much effort goes into link-building and how long you have to wait for results, it may be tempting to resort to black-hat tactics.
Part of the problem is that such tactics are still very popular. 92% of our study participants believe that their competitors buy links. And they often yield results.
Sometimes, you may be getting pressure from your clients to speed things up and rely on dodgy practices.
How do you resist it?
Claudia McKenzie, the Outreach Lead at Orange Line, focuses on client education:
What if your link-building agency uses unethical tactics?
Depends on how deeply ingrained they are in their processes. Many companies have built their business on black-hat tactics, so they may not be able to deliver results otherwise. That’s how they roll.
So, parting ways may be the only way. Which is hard if it’s bringing results because it’s often difficult to see that their impact is only short-term.
If black hat tactics are a no-go, what tactics should you use to build links? What’s the best link-building strategy?
Digital PR, according to our survey participants.
That’s because it doesn’t focus on link-building as such but on growing your brand visibility, explains Brad Russell:
There’s no doubt that digital PR can be super-effective. A single campaign can get you a bunch of links from highly authoritative media outlets with a huge readership. Even if they’re nofollow, they still bring tons of referral traffic to your site.
But Brad admits that these tactics are difficult to implement for many businesses.
Reliance on one tactic can be risky because, as mentioned, results take a while to generate, and you won’t see if your strategy is effective for a while. So you could spend a lot of money on something that brings no result.
Moreover, using just one tactic, say guest posting, gives you only one type of link, and this makes your link profile unnatural.
So, instead, we recommend using 3-6 tactics to mitigate the risks.
Search engine algorithm updates are another thing that you need to cope with when planning your link-building efforts.
Google constantly updates its search algorithms to improve the quality of search results. And links are often one of the factors that they affect.
For example, the 2012 Penguin update targeted spammy link practices like buying links from link farms, and that’s when Google started dishing out manual penalties. In 2022, the rollout of SpamBrain changed how Google treats spammy links: instead of penalizing sites, it just ignores them. And in 2019, Google stopped ignoring nofollow/ugc/sponsored links when ranking content.
As a link-builder, you need to keep on top of all these changes and industry best practices for your campaigns to work. (This is also a reason to diversify your link profiles. If you rely on one tactic and the big G suddenly decides it’s meh, you’re shafted.)
And even if the update doesn’t directly concern backlinks, it can still wreak havoc in SERPs, as we’ve seen from the 2023-24 core and helpful content updates over the last couple of years. This affects your ability to deliver on business objectives. And makes attribution even more challenging.
Backlinks profile management is much more complex than just the number of links you have and the DR and traffic of the pages that they come from.
Factors like link placement in the website structure, whether it's follow or nofollow, the anchor text, the specific page the link appears in, or the context surrounding it matter a lot, too.
And as a link-builder, you don’t always have control over such aspects, says Szymon Slowik:
What’s the solution?
Szymon recommends using methods that give you control, like purchasing publications from reputable publishers through high-quality marketplaces.
This may get you in the gray or even black area, though, unless the link is marked as ‘sponsored.’
Guest posting is another way to maintain control over your link placement.
A lot here depends on the quality of your relationships with your link-building partners. The closer you work together, the more you can ask for.
Let’s face it: if you want an easy job, link-building isn’t for you. Competition is fierce, the goalposts are constantly moving, and teams are regularly underresourced to face the challenges.
Navigating such a landscape requires expertise, skills, and networks that may be difficult to build in-house. And sometimes, it makes more sense to focus your internal teams on other high-value activities and outsource link-building to a reputable agency.
If you’re considering this option, get in touch with the Editorial.Link team! We can help!