A lot has happened in SEO over the last 12 months. AI-driven search results, the push towards zero-click content, the rise of Reddit, Google's "parasite SEO" crackdown, and volatile algorithm updates, to name just a few major developments.
How are these changes affecting link-building?
Building on our 2024 study, which identified trends like the effectiveness of Digital PR and early AI adoption in link-building, this year's report dives deeper.
We surveyed 518 SEO professionals — in-house experts (29.9%), freelancers (24.9%), agency specialists/execs (44.4%), and others (0.8%) — primarily from Europe (46.3%), the United States (25.5%), the United Kingdom (16.2%), and otherregions (12%).
We reached more than half of them via personalized outreach on LinkedIn. We also used ads and email campaigns.
Conducted between March and May 2025, this study details their insights on AI's expanding influence, link-building budgets, preferred tools, key metrics, and strategies in this volatile SEO environment.
Key Takeaways
Link Building Trends
73.2% believe backlinks influence the chance of appearing in AI search results.
In this section, we explore general link-building trends to understand the changes over the last 12 months.
The majority of respondents agree that links affect rankings in AI search results. This aligns with our observations and recent study results.
Google uses its top-ranking results for AI overviews and Gemini responses, and ChatGPT relies on top-ranking pages on Bing for live web data, so backlinks — still a major ranking factor — increase the likelihood of getting featured.
For other LLMs, like Perplexity, it's less about the link juice. Their responses are based on content from trusted sources, so mentions, linked or unlinked, make citations more likely.
EXPERT OPINIONS
Do you believe that backlinks affect the chance of appearing in AI search results like ChatGPT?
Backlinks itself no, but the mentions of high-authority sites, yes.
Peter Rota
SEO Specialist
Backlinks may not directly affect AI search results like ChatGPT, as AI models primarily rely on the vast datasets they are trained on. However, high-quality backlinks can improve a website's authority and overall search ranking, indirectly increasing the likelihood of being referenced by AI-powered platforms, especially when they cite reliable and authoritative sources.
Sheyne Branconnier
Global Marketing Executive
I believe they do, in a very similar way to how they do for traditional SEO. Traditionally, backlinks equal trust and authority and, as such, directly influence ranking in SERPs. AI search results base their selection on content relevance, authority, and structured data. So, if your content has quality backlinks, it's more likely to be considered trustworthy and authoritative by AI systems.
Jovana Smoljanovic Tucakov
B2B SaaS Content and SEO Strategist
I believe regular brand mentions, links, and citations help with appearing in AI search results, not just backlinks themselves. It's more about a site being referenced regularly across the web.
Sophie Brannon
Co-Founder & Director of StudioHawk US
I believe mentions do help appear in AI search results, so if the mention comes with a link, that's great, as this will help show up in AI search results like GPT Search or any other AI that uses active search on the internet.
Carmen Domínguez
Organic Growth Director
Backlinks as such, not really, but as part of a co-citation and branded strategy yes, if the backlinks are on websites typically used as sources by LLM. Then, because of RAG, backlinks improve the visibility/ranking on Search Engines, hence the possibilities of being used as source increase.
Gianluca Fiorelli
SEO Consultant and AI Strategist
It depends: backlinks = authority = relevance toward AI search.
Steven Schneider
CEO @ TrioSEO
Of being found by AI bots (so it's important but not sufficient factor).
Szymon Słowik
Founder of takaoto.pro
There's potential as long as the neural networks at the kernels of LLMs improve citations matching.
Simone De Palma
Founder of SEO Depths
I think it is more about the brand's textual association with the topic vs. the link itself.
Lauren Funaro
Content Marketing Manager
Backlinks as mentions, not backlinks as pagerank.
Bruno Rodríguez Armesto
Enterprise Organic Growth Specialist
Somewhat as it also uses search results to pull information, but it's not a big part of it, especially if deep research is used, then it just becomes a smaller part of the results AI provides.
Ruan Smit
SEO Specialist
As it is mixed, brand through traditional PR also helps with AI search results and combined with backlinks for SEO purposes.
Jeremy Scott
International Digital Marketing Team Leader
The vast majority — nearly 80% — of respondents believe that nofollow links affect search rankings. This aligns with the findings of multiple experiments and anecdotal data we’ve seen over the last 2 years.
The question is what it means in practice. Last year, we asked our respondents if they actively built nofollow links, and only 46.9% responded ‘yes.’ This is a different question — recognizing the nofollow link impact doesn’t mean actively pursuing them — so it would be interesting to see if this has changed.
80.9% of surveyed specialists believe that unlinked brand mentions influence organic search rankings. Although not a ranking factor as such, unlinked mentions can affect rankings indirectly by building brand awareness, trust, authority, and visibility online.
Do you believe your competitors buy backlinks?
Yes – 476 responses – 91.89%
No – 42 responses – 8.11%
91.89% of respondents believe their competitors buy links. In 2024, 92% of our survey participants gave the same answer, so we expected the majority to choose this answer, but we didn’t think the two figures would be so close.
Do you think Google is good at identifying and discounting paid links?
Yes – 228 responses – 44.02%
No – 290 responses – 55.98%
Just over half of the surveyed specialists believe Google is not effective at identifying and discounting paid links. This confirms our gut feelings about the effectiveness of Google’s SpamBrain and other algorithms. While cheap farm links are fairly easy to pick up, identifying paid guest posts or niche edits is hard as long as they’re relevant.
In your experience, can a website rank high on Google search without backlinks?
Yes — 336 responses — 64.9%
No — 182 responses — 35.1%
Two-thirds of the survey participants believe links aren’t necessary to rank high on Google. We have indeed seen instances when pages in niche sectors targeting low competition keywords ranked high without backlinks.
Link Building Budgets, Costs & ROI
What financial investment ($) do you consider acceptable for acquiring one high-quality backlink?
Based on responses from 412 participants, we’ve calculated the average acceptable cost of acquiring one high-quality link to be $508.95.
Our participants pointed out that this depended on referring domains and the page they linked to: higher prices were easier to justify for links from high-authority domains and to high-intent pages with commercial value.
When it comes to PR links, their cost might be tricky to estimate, as one campaign brings multiple links. To calculate it, you need to factor in the cost of producing the asset and the PR efforts, and divide it by the number of secured links.
EXPERT OPINIONS
What financial investment ($) do you consider acceptable for acquiring one high-quality backlink?
It would all depend on the ROI. I wouldn't spend more than a few hundred dollars for informational posts that typically only bring traffic and no leads. But if the data showcases the potential for high rewards, even more than $1000 would be justified.
George K.
SEO Manager at Moosend
We consider an investment of around $500 to $1,500 per backlink, depending on the authority and relevance of the publication or site we are targeting. This range reflects the value of securing a backlink from reputable sources like major media outlets, niche publications, or industry-specific platforms.
Sheyne Branconnier
Global Marketing Executive
We calculate 10-15 hours of work to acquire one high authority link. That, based on average DPR salaries in the US + overhead, comes out to $50/1h work, we could say that to acquire one link will cost in the range of $1k.
Kristaps Brencans
CEO at Onthemap.com
It's difficult as a PR campaign of $3-5,000 often ends up with multiple links. So I'll average it and say $1,000.
Phillip Stemann
SEO Consultant | Freelancer
$1,000, but needs to be in a competitive field.
Bill Sebald
Founder of Greenlane Digital Marketing
If it's to a very important page, I'd consider paying $500-1000.
Edward Sturm
SEO & Marketer
Depends on the statistics of the referring domain, the research that goes into the content, and what value the content carries outside of link building.
Jeff Romero
Founder at Octiv Digital
There are so many different factors and kinds of links, it's hard to just give a value. But people are known to pay $500 to $1500 for high quality outreach earned links.
Justin Davis
Local SEO & Web Design Specialist
$500 - $700 depending on how hard it is to get the link from the site, if the target page is a blog post/product page or brand mention, the DR range, site traffic, and relevancy.
Cole Phan
Email Outreach Specialist
80.9% of surveyed specialists think link-building will become harder and more expensive over the next 2–3 years.
Growing competition, algorithm updates, and tightening editorial standards are likely to make link building more difficult and drive prices up. As shown above, the biggest overhead in link-building is hiring content creators, designers, and outreach specialists. So we can expect link prices to rise in line with increasing salaries and freelancer fees.
What is the minimum monthly link-building budget ($) required to compete in highly competitive niches?
$8,406 is the average minimum monthly budget needed to compete in highly competitive niches (only 75% of participants answered the question).
The lowest monthly figure our participants provided was $4000, and the highest — $150K. Our experts mention the niche, campaign scale, and market size as the main factors that determine link-building budgets.
EXPERT OPINIONS
What is the minimum monthly link-building budget ($) required to compete in highly competitive niches?
Depends on your goals. For some, it might be as low as a few hundred dollars or more. For others, it could easily get into five figures.
Chris Shirlow
Agency Owner @ FourHorse Digital
The minimum link-building budget required to compete in highly competitive niches like finance typically starts at $10,000–$30,000 per month, with smaller efforts beginning around $5,000/month and top-tier strategies exceeding $100,000/month, depending on the quality and scale of backlinks needed.
Camilla Engelstad Holt
SEO Content Specialist @ NOBA Bank Group
In Sweden: +$4000, but generally much higher the bigger the market/country.
Caroline Danielsson
Head of SEO at Brath AB with 10+ years of SEO experience
$10,000 to $25,000 depending on niches. We used to spend $150K+/ month when I was at Kucoin.
Samy Ben Sadok
I help SEOs sign clients through LinkedIn
In law firm and contractor space for a big city, at least $5k, going upward towards $10k+.
Kristaps Brencans
CEO at Onthemap.com
For clients in highly competitive niches, we allocate 50% of budget per month for link building. Tricky question to answer without more context.
Claire Ransom
SEO expert & content consultant
10,000-20,000$ depending on how competitive the niche.
Laura Golce
Senior SEO Consultant
Depends on the country but generally at least $5k/month.
Daragh Nener-Lally
Full-stack SEO strategist
$25,000 per month (depends on industry).
Eric Enge
President at Pilot Holding
Hard to say. Easily 5-figures per month.
Antonio Gabrić
Marketing & Partnerships @ Hunter.io
What percentage of your overall SEO budget is allocated to link building?
Teams allocate around a third of their overall SEO budgets on link-building. Agency professionals spend on average 32.1% and in-house teams 36.03% of their overall SEO budget to building links.
Interestingly, some teams see link-building as a marketing channel in its own right — and with dedicated budgets.
EXPERT OPINIONS
What percentage of your overall SEO budget is allocated to link building?
We don't have a specific budget allocation for link building. Most of our budgets go into content production for our clients. Although we always strongly advise investing in link building, getting budget approved isn't the easiest (our clients value our content production skills more so than other adjacent SEO practices). If I had to make a guesstimate, it would be around 0-5% of SEO budgets.
Jonas van de Poel
Head of Content Marketing @ Unmuted
40/50%, but this depends on the industry. If an industry is a lot more competitive, we will allocate more of the budget to link building.
Ben Duffy
Client Development Manager at Quirky Digital
It is a separate budget from “SEO”, because I consider link building (I prefer to call it “amplification” because it is not only about links) a very tied but separate discipline than SEO, and for that reason it should be executed by people/agencies who/that do only that job.
Gianluca Fiorelli
Strategic and International SEO Consultant and AI Strategist
Depends on the project, sometimes as much as 90%, sometimes 0%. On average, it's about half of it.
Olesia Korobka
SEO consultant and entrepreneur
30-40% depending on the client.
Peter Rota
SEO Specialist
70% to link building when we include content produciton into it.
Angelina Popovic
SEO & Content Expert
Very dependant on client again! Some 0% some 40%+.
Alex Moran
Team Lead in an Agency
80% (depends on the scope and phase of the project).
Konstantine Ge
B2B SaaS Revenue-driven SEO & Growth Strategist
*Participants were allowed to choose a few answers to this question..
iGaming and gambling are notoriously challenging niches because of cut-throat competition and limited opportunities, with individual links costing $50k. That’s why it isn’t surprising that 61% of the surveyed specialists believe these businesses have the largest link-building budgets.
The other sectors in the top 5 — Law (16.4%), Finance (11.6%), Health & Wellness (7.1%), Payday loans (6.8%) are also considered highly competitive.
EXPERT OPINIONS
Which industries allocate the highest budgets for link building?
iGaming, online betting, finance - anything that is highly competitive in Google.
Harry Clarkson-Bennett
SEO Director @ The Telegraph
iGaming 100%, I've worked in the field before, and companies in that niche are comfortable spending $50K a link.
Alexander S.
Senior SEO specialist
Payday Loans & Gambling, because not many sites want to link to them.
Sophie Brannon
Co-Founder & Director of StudioHawk US
Online Betting -- HANDS DOWN. They're also the ones that do a lot of shady tactics like affiliate links without "nofollow / sponsored," yet Google does NOT seem to pick up on this because they're temporary. They drive equity up until the "game" and then they're replaced with the "next game's" links.
Derek Hobson
Senior Director, SEO / ASO at Brainlabs
I would say the SEO niche, the SAAS niche, the payday loans, and the pharma. Gambling would 100% have the biggest, most online SEO casinos run on a churn and burn model, I've heard link budgets in the 20,000$ a month range.
Aidan Coleman
SEO Specialist Sydney
The finance industry consistently allocates some of the highest budgets for link building due to the competitive nature of the sector. This includes areas such as banking, investment, insurance, fintech, and personal finance, where high-authority backlinks are essential for building trust. Given the strict regulations and the need for credibility, finance brands often invest heavily in digital PR and other high-quality outreach campaigns to secure authoritative links from reputable sources.
Ben Duffy
Client Development Manager at Quirky Digital
Anything that needs EEAT or that needs social proof, so luxury brands, high end services, finance, health.
Katie McDonald
Senior SEO Specialist
Any highly competitive industry with high SEO investment. iGaming, gambling, finance, law, insurance etc.
Sam Cant
Head of SEO at Jaywing
While I don’t work in these niches, industries like casino, loans, and legal services must probably invest heavily in link building due to high competition, strict ad regulations, and the high value of organic traffic.
Alina Tytarenko
Outreach Team Lead at SE Ranking
From past experience, it's personal finance - including loans, mortgages, car insurance, house insurance etc.
Andy Frobisher
BrightonSEO speaker
I would have to say betting. I do not work in betting or any other industry that demanding. I have SaaS, AI and eCommerce clients.
George Ilic
Founder @TheRTM
What do you consider a reasonable timeframe to see results from your link-building investment?
57.1% of respondents expect to see link-building results within 1–3 months.
1–3 months — 296 — 57.1% 3–6 months — 171 — 33.0% Less than 1 month — 31 — 6.0% More than 6 months — 20 — 3.9%
Most survey participants (57.1%) expect to see results from their link-building efforts in 1-3 months. This is in line with our observations: while it’s possible to achieve results in under a month, it may not be enough to secure high-quality backlinks and see their impact on SEO performance.
Do you outsource link-building tasks to agencies or freelancers?
No, it’s all in-house – 228 responses – 44.02% Yes, we outsource at least part of our link building – 290 responses – 55.98%
56% of respondents outsource at least part of their link-building tasks, while 44% handle everything in-house. Considering the strain on internal resources that link-building can place on in-house resources, we thought more businesses would outsource it.
Ahrefs leads as the top all-in-one SEO tool, chosen by 59.1% of respondents. This came as no surprise because Ahrefs has the highest market share of all the named SEO tools.
Our participants rated Ahrefs as the most accurate and comprehensive backlink data provider, far ahead of Semrush. Considering that most respondents use Ahrefs as their go-to tool, this outcome was predictable.
If you had to choose only one domain authority metric, which one would you pick?
DR and UR (Ahrefs) - 332 - 64.1% Authority Score (Semrush) - 80 - 15.4% DA and PA (Moz) - 60 - 11.6% CF and TF (Majestic) - 46 - 8.9%
Again, Ahrefs comes out on top with over 64% of respondents preferring its DR and UR as their main domain authority metrics.
Link Building Strategies & Tactics
Digital PR is seen as the most effective link-building tactic for 2025, chosen by 48.6% of respondents — far ahead of guest posting (16%) and creating linkable assets (12%).
The three tactics were also considered most effective by our survey participants last year.
But as our experts pointed out, these won’t necessarily be the best tactics in all circumstances, and their success depends on other tactics. For instance, digital PR will have limited impact without quality linkable assets.
EXPERT OPINIONS
What link-building tactic do you consider to be the most effective in 2025?
There is no one tactic for two reasons. First of all, it depends on the company. For companies with a strong, recognizable brand, data-based reports on industry trends can be an amazing source of links, especially when backed up with some PR. On the other hand, a small e-commerce company might want to give away free products for reviews or giveaways. The second reason is that the different tactics are interlinked - you need to have good assets/content to make PR efforts successful.
José Iglesias Wareham
CSPII Language Division Director & Methodology Specialist
It depends on the scale of the site. I work on one client in particular that has in excess of 1M backlinks. For them, broken link curation is more effective than anything else. But, for a small site, guest posting, niche edits, and digital PR might be more effective.
Lee Macklin
Head of SEO at Organic
Mention in the listicles.
Olesia Kuzmyk
SEO, PR Outreach Specialist @Mailtrap
Sponsored articles (in real media, legit outlets with traffic, journalists, news etc.).
Szymon Słowik
founder of takaoto.pro
Links from sites that are considered the competitive and are ranking for the same keywords that you either want to rank for our already rank for.
Justin Davis
Local SEO & Web Design Specialist
Community Building Reddit & Social media.
Veronika Höller
Head of Demand Generation @Tresorit
A mix of the above varied to the clients link-building expectations and also budget.
Jeremy Scott
International Digital Marketing Team Leader
Creating good content that people want to link to, e.g doing surveys, whitepapers and studies.
Kelly Sheppard
Founder of The Structured Data Company
Our respondents clearly consider finding unique backlink opportunities more effective than replicating competitors’ backlinks. This is understandable, as this is the only way to gain the competitive edge.
However, we didn’t anticipate two-thirds to go with this response. Our intuition told us most respondents would go with a “Mix of both,” as we can see the best results from this approach. However, it was the 3rd most popular answer, with only 10% choosing it.
EXPERT OPINIONS
Which strategy is more effective: copying the link profile of successful competitors or finding unique opportunities for getting links?
Both; It's good to have a general sense of what's working.. but also find other new opportunities to win.
Bill Gaule
Co-Founder & SEO Director at SERPsculpt
I'd say mix of both: in local we need to get the niche directories, then you go further and try to identify more unique placement opportunities that the competitor doesn't have. Landing more big media sites. Landing data-driven studies. We focus more on our own tactics rather than getting the exact links competitor has.
Kristaps Brencans
CEO at Onthemap.com
Mirroring competitors' authoritative backlinks provides a foundational advantage, but curating your own unique, authoritative links will provide the biggest authority gap between you and your competitors. Having five backlinks from 5 authority sites provides much more of an advantage than five authority links from the same site. It demonstrates broad expertise and amplifies your signal. Ultimately, backlink quantity, when coupled with quality, drives measurable SEO impact. Of course, that's easier said than done and is a good reason SEO is and always will be a long-term strategy.
Jason G.
Growth Strategist & SEO Consultant
Stop focusing exclusively on backlinks and start focusing on brand mentions - linked or unlinked - in relevant publications. Your competitors could be getting links in wildly irrelevant publications - that doesn't bode well for your site's reputation and authority to follow suit.
Katie Bonadies
Manager, Content Strategy & SEO
70% catch up / replicate successful competitors, 30% try to do different things.
Edward Bate
SEO Consultant
Balanced approach: The best competitor's backlinks + new backlink opps.
Andriy Terentyev
SEO Consultant at Travel SEO
A hybrid of the two works best: exploit and explore. Go after the sites that link to competitors, and also the sites that link to the sites that rank for keywords we target.
Ian Ferguson
Freelance SEO Consultant
I replicate DR. If it's easy enough to replicate actual links, I will,l but strong effort doesn't go into it. As long as the "average" DR is generally the same, we are headed in the right direction.
Steven J. Wilson
Director of SEO at Above The Bar Marketing
Combining competitor insights with unique link opportunities gives the best results in terms of quantity and link diversity.
Alina Tytarenko
Outreach Team Lead at SE Ranking
Replicate their best links while diversifying yourself from the competitors using strong placements via HARO and Digital PR
Oleksandr Tereshchenko
Link-Focused Expert PR
Entirely depends on the state of the current backlink profile. If your competitors are securing links on websites that are relevant to your industry, then you would naturally look to secure the same links anyway.
Naomi Francis-Parker
SEO Manager (FTC) at Charlotte Tilbury Beauty
Mix of both, you can innovate and at the same time "Steal Like an Artist".
Angelo A.
SEO Strategist
Begin with the first to find key link opportunities, but then differentiate.
Antonis Dimitriou
SEO Lead at Minuttia
Most of our survey participants named PBNs as the most effective of the “somehow shady or risky” tactics, followed by acquiring expired domains to leverage their backlink profiles, and guest posting on low-quality sites.
EXPERT OPINIONS
Which link-building methods do you consider somewhat shady or risky but still effective?
The problem with all these methods is not only that they are risky, but also the opportunity cost. Even if some of them might be somewhat effective (at least in the short term), you're wasting time, money, and energy that you should be spending on a genuinely good link-building strategy.
José Iglesias Wareham
CSPII Language Division Director & Methodology Specialist
Depends on the niche, and it can be a risk to rely on one strategy, so I'd diversify.
Bibi the Link Builder
BibiBuzz.com - Websitey makey linky
All can work if done properly, but they're all not worth the risk IMHO.
Edward Sturm
SEO & Marketer
Those backlink tactics, while tempting, violate Google's guidelines and are considered manipulative. Instead, focus on creating expert-level content that naturally attracts relevant, high-quality links. Authentic expertise and valuable contributions are the most effective, sustainable SEO strategies. However, it's worth noting that forum comments, press releases, and directory submissions can be valuable if used responsibly. To avoid penalties, ensure relevance and genuine contribution, rather than mass, automated link insertion. Focus on quality and context, not just quantity.
Jason G.
Growth Strategist & SEO Consultant
None of the above, I haven't seen success with none of them, even after testing on test websites I don't care for to see the effect.
Phillip Stemann
SEO Consultant | Freelancer
Paid for guest posts generally shady but still work well.
Sophie Brannon
Co-Founder & Director of StudioHawk
What type of anchor text do you prioritize when building backlinks?
Partial-match anchor text is the top choice for 41.7% of respondents, followed by exact-match (25.1%) and branded anchors (20.5%).
What type of pages do you consider the most important for getting links?
Service / Product Pages — 273 votes — 52.7% Blog Posts / Articles — 199 votes — 38.4% Homepage — 37 votes — 7.1% Other — 9 votes — 1.7%
52.7% of experts consider product and service pages as the most important for link acquisition. This makes perfect sense, considering their role in the conversion funnel.
Blog posts (38.4%) came second, before homepages (7.1%). While less important than money pages, blogs are easier to build links to as there are more relevant opportunities, and they still enhance the domain authority and can pass PageRank via internal links.
Link Building Risks & Challenges
What factors are red flags for you when assessing a website for link placement?
Spammy outbound links – 461 (89.0%)
Low-quality content – 447 (86.3%)
Poor domain authority metrics – 374 (72.2%)
Low relevance – 348 (67.2%)
Declining organic traffic – 331 (63.9%)
Spammy outbound links were a major red flag when assessing sites for possible placements for 89.0% of respondents. Such practices dilute the link value and put the website at risk of getting deindexed.
Low content quality was a red flag for 86.3% of respondents, while poor website metrics for 72.2%. Lack of topical relevance and declining organic traffic came fourth and fifth.
When asked if they are happy to place links on sites that sell links, only 36.9% of the respondents said they wouldn’t do it. For 63.1% of participants, such websites were legitimate targets provided the quality was good enough.
Only 39.0% of surveyed specialists still use the Google Disavow tool. Google itself recommends using it only in extreme situations, Bing has sunset the feature altogether, and experiments have shown disavowing links can actually hurt page performance, so this result was foreseeable.
Do you consider link building to be the most challenging part of SEO?
55.2% of surveyed specialists consider link building the most challenging part of SEO. However, the gap isn’t as large as we might have anticipated. It would be interesting to hear which SEO aspects the remaining 45% consider most challenging.
What do you think is the biggest challenge in link-building right now?
High costs of acquiring premium backlinks — 389 (75.1%)*
Scaling link-building efforts without losing quality — 348 (67.2%)
Measuring ROI & effectiveness — 274 (52.9%)
Keeping Link Profiles Natural — 204 (39.4%)
Google’s Algorithm Updates — 182 (35.1%)
Declining Effectiveness of Guest Posting — 119 (23.0%)
Building Links to Commercial Pages — 117 (22.6%)
Client budget as an additional expense — 5 (1.0%)
* Participants were allowed to choose multiple answers.
Most respondents mentioned challenges related to the resource-intensive nature of link-building: high cost of premium backlinks as the biggest challenge (75.1%), and scaling link-building without sacrificing quality (67.2%).
A technical challenge, measuring link-building ROI, came third, chosen by 52.9% of the experts.
Thank You Contributors
Newsletters
Influencers
Peter Rota
SEO Specialist
Tom Winter
Founder SEOwind
Connor Gillivan
Founder TrioSEO
Jairo Guerrero
Founder & Head of Strategy Organic Hackers
Statistics
State of Link Building | 2024
Dmitry Sokhach
Founder & CEO
Adelina Karpenkova
Content marketer & writer
Methodology and geography
Is link-building bound to change with the rise of AI? Are your competitors buying links? What’s the most effective link-building tactic in 2024?
To find the answers, we surveyed 113 SEO experts across Europe (30.1%), the United States (28.3%), and the United Kingdom (27.4%). We also had participants from Australia (4.4%), Canada (3.5%), and other countries (6.2%).
The survey targeted both in-house (39%) and outsourced (61%) professionals. The participants answered 22 close-ended questions designed to reveal current trends, dispel myths, and highlight the most commonly applied techniques. Additionally, we asked the leading SEO experts to answer one open-ended question to gather their individual perspectives. The results were often surprising, and we believe we’ve accomplished our goals. See for yourself!
Exciting Link Building Trends Unveiled by Industry Experts
Explore the report to uncover crucial insights into link building
from leading experts in the field
92% of surveyed respondents believe that competitors buy links
83.2% of surveyed specialists believe that the impact of link building on rankings and traffic can be seen in two weeks or more
67.3% of surveyed respondents named digital PR as the most effective link-building tactic. The next two most popular tactics were guest posting (38.9%) and linkable assets (36.3%)
53,9% spend over $300 to acquire one quality link
69% of surveyed SEO specialists named Ahrefs Domain Rating (DR) as the most reliable metric for determining domain authority
According to 84.6% of respondents, relevance is the main metric used to assess the quality of a backlink. The next most important factors were domain authority scores (68.3%) and site traffic (68.3%)
37.2% of link-building specialists named Hunter.io the best email finder
64.6% voted for Ahrefs as the best all-in-one SEO tool
58.4% rate the impact of links as high
69% do not use the Google disavow tools
Almost half of those surveyed (47.8%) consider link building the most challenging part of SEO
74.3% of surveyed SEO experts believe that Ahrefs provides the most comprehensive backlink data
46.9% of surveyed specialists make an effort to get nofollow links
44.2% say they use AI tools in link-building efforts
Only 31.8% of surveyed respondents believe one person can build over 20 links per month
71.1% believe that it is possible to rank high on Google solely through quality content, without relying on backlinks
CHAPTER 1
Survey participants
In-house expert: 39%
Agency-side expert: 38%
Freelancer/consultant: 23%
The majority of the respondents are outsourced professionals representing agencies (38%) and freelancer roles (23%).
In-house experts contributed a significant 39% of the survey responses.
CHAPTER 2
Role breakdown
Head of SEO (26.5%) and SEO Consultant (25.7%) have been the most common roles among the survey respondents. Additionally, a notable portion of respondents (12.4%) are CEOs.
Now, let’s see what all these people have to say about their link-building strategies
CHAPTER 3
Do you outsource link building?
Yes: 31.1%
No: 68.9%
Interestingly, over two-thirds (68.9%) of surveyed companies choose to keep link building in-house. This might be connected to the fact that a significant portion of our respondents are agency owners and freelance experts who offer link-building services.
CHAPTER 4
How long does it typically take you to see the impact of link building on rankings and traffic?
Almost half of the respondents (42.5%) indicated it takes 2-4 weeks to see the impact of link building on rankings and traffic. A further 37.2% see results within 6 weeks.
Surprisingly, 15% of respondents reported seeing no correlation between link building and their rankings/traffic.
CHAPTER 5
What link-building tactic do you consider to be the most effective?
What link-building tactic do you consider to be the most effective? Digital PR stands out as the clear favorite among link-building techniques. A significant 67.3% of respondents would choose it if resources allow. Guest posting follows with 38.9% of respondents considering it highly effective.
Despite ongoing debates about its effectiveness, Linkable Assets remains a viable tactic for roughly a third of respondents (36.3%).
Podcast link building and social mentions rank among the least popular tactics.
CHAPTER 6
What is the average cost of acquiring 1 high quality link?
$100-$150
$350-$400
$150-$200
$400-$600
$200-$250
$600-$800
$250-$300
$800-$1000
$300-$350
Impossible to calculate
Around one-third (31%) of SEO experts and marketing managers spend less than $300 to acquire one high-quality link. Twenty-three percent of respondents spend between $400 and $600 per link. And only 14.1% spend over $600.
Considering the variety of resources and effort involved in acquiring high-quality links, it's understandable that 15% of companies find it challenging to calculate the exact cost.
How do you educate clients or stakeholders about the value and ROI of link building?
Amy Irvine
Katie McDonald
Will Rice
Ihor Hryhorenko
Steven Schneider
Jesse Ringer
It’s really important to look at the value of link building (or digital PR) beyond just link numbers. Long gone are the days of just reporting on the number of links. You need to be looking at the quality and relevance of your links. And I don’t just mean the DR of a link, you need to be reporting on things such as the number of links into target pages, the anchor text, the relevancy of a link, and much more.
You also need to ensure that the links you are securing are driving real growth in the SERPs. You should also be reporting on wider metrics such as organic traffic, organic revenue, and keyword rankings.
It’s important to have conversations with your clients about their wider business goals and ensure your digital PR strategy is going to support them in hitting these goals.
I educate clients that the value of link building can accelerate their existing SEO campaigns. Quality isn’t high DR, but relevancy and traffic. Those links build trust with Google. It will WANT to rank you higher. Better relevant rankings mean more traffic… and more leads!
I think the best way to educate stakeholders on the importance of link building is by showing them what their competition is doing.
That could be their commercial competitors or SERP competitors. What is causing the top 3 to rank in the top 3 for their target keywords? Usually link building has a role to play and by demonstrating that you can show people the value of doing it.
Use a tool like Ahrefs to identify SERP competitors for your client's target keywords and analyze the backlink profiles of the top-ranking pages against the client's.
We often describe links (and link building) as acquiring online 'votes of confidence.' While many want to cut corners here, a slow, strategic plan always wins. Choose a link-building method that makes sense for your brand.
We love podcasting because links are relevant, valuable to readers, and typically from authoritative partners — plus, you get extra exposure being on the podcast. Once a client understands the value and ROI of establishing those partnerships, creating content is 10x easier (and more impactful).
Which metric do you consider to be the most reliable for determining domain authority?
Ahrefs DR
Majestic TF/CF
Semrush AS
Moz DA
A whopping 69% of respondents rely on Ahrefs DR as their primary metric for determining domain authority. The remaining votes are split almost evenly between Semrush AS (11.5%), Majestic TF/CF (12.4%), and Moz DA (7.1%).
What metric(s) do you use to measure the quality of a backlink?
Dana DiTomaso
Braden Becker
Third-party metrics like DR have their place as one of the many metrics to take into consideration when evaluating the success of your link-building efforts, but it certainly shouldn't be the only factor and it also shouldn't be an important factor. You're relying on third-party tools to notice your link-building efforts, which depending on what industry you work in and how high-traffic your site is, might be somewhat correct, or could be totally off. Instead, you want to look at the effects of the link building itself, not just a metric put together by an SEO tool provider.
On the one hand, B2B sites are particularly difficult to build links for because you’re limited in brand awareness, and therefore leverage, if you’re going after non-paid links. On the other hand, B2C has the challenge of deep customer overlap. You could argue that multi-vertical retailers compete with every online store on the internet. This can deter potential partners who would otherwise have relevant links to offer you.
Ultimately, B2B folks who can find a common audience in many non-competing or ‘complementary’ sites are probably having the best time. But I don’t envy those who build links for sites like Amazon or Temu — assuming active link building is still important to them.
What metric(s) do you use to measure the quality of a backlink?
Link relevance is the top priority for determining backlink quality, with 84.6% of SEOs relying on it. Site traffic (68.3%) and domain authority scores (68.3%) are also highly valued metrics. Fewer specialists prioritize the inbound-outbound link ratio (26.9%) and the overall link profile of the donor's site (30.8%).
The data shows that experts hardly ever consider criteria like individual page traffic or content quality to determine the quality of a link.
How do you approach building links for a new website versus an established one?
Irina Maltseva
Antonio Gabrić
Piotr Olesson
Liam Quirk
Carmen Domínguez Rodríguez
Andreas Karle
For new websites, leveraging personal connections and contributing guest posts are effective starting points. Personal connections can provide early backlinks and guest posting on relevant sites helps establish authority and visibility.
For established websites, cold outreach, building long-term relationships, and guest posting are key strategies. Cold outreach can uncover new opportunities, while nurturing relationships over time can lead to more organic link-building opportunities. Guest posts continue to be valuable for gaining high-quality backlinks.
In both scenarios, hiring freelancers or agencies can accelerate the link-building process, bringing expertise and additional resources to the strategy.
For established websites, my focus initially is on covering the low-hanging fruit. These involve claiming unlinked mentions and reclaiming lost backlinks. Unlinked mentions are typically an easy target since your brand is already mentioned, albeit without a link.
Another tactic I favor is inserting our site into listicles. I search for relevant listicles that don’t mention our website and contact the authors. I offer to contribute a section that fits seamlessly into their article, including a backlink from our partner's site.
Employing these three strategies will bolster your brand's authority and can even drive conversions through your link-building efforts.
For new websites, I concentrate on guest posts, as many webmasters are hesitant to link to sites with a Domain Rating (DR) below 50. Once I secure 5 to 10 guest posts, I look for partners who are also interested in publishing guest posts or can accommodate link insertions. A single guest post can realistically include 3 to 5 external links, meaning 10 guest posts could result in 30 to 50 unique backlinks. This strategy alone can significantly boost your site's traction and foster valuable partnerships.
Our approach to backlink building for a new website is to use a 3-step process to create a solid relevant backlink foundation.
Step 1: We aim to obtain all relevant business and local links where and if applicable first (even though some are nofollow for example: LinkedIn, local business directories, social media platforms, etc. to help with backlink diversity, website credibility, and brand visibility).
Step 2: Look at opportunities from existing direct competitors. Is there anything that can be leveraged example relevant guest posts, upcoming relevant events, sponsorships, and so on?
Step 3: Build custom data-driven or thought leadership campaigns which is primarily done via digital PR.
When looking at generating backlinks for more established websites we usually only focus on step 2 and 3 and skip 1 entirely.
When starting link building on a fresh domain, my usual approach would be to build the brand's entity — we always begin with foundational links such as citations, and adding the site to industry-specific websites.
This doesn’t make a massive difference as most brands can build these, but it builds solid foundations and you can get the ball rolling with a high velocity.
The historic way of approaching link building would be looking at what your competitors have and trying to build as many of them as you can.
This can help, but in my opinion, you have to find the real gems yourself and it’s likely that most of your competitors won’t have them.
If you are a new brand, you need to stand out from the crowd and as of now, you can do that with digital PR.
Digital PR is definitely the “sexy” way of building links right now, and if you are a start-up that has the budget for it, then this will not only demonstrate credibility but it will also positively influence brand awareness and ultimately how many people are searching for your brand.
Link building for established brands has to be much more strategic, and in some cases, you have to look at it from a page level, rather than the domain.
Creativity is key when building links for a new website. If the company is not well-known already in their own space, I would try to make sure they get in front of the public, whether that is on social media or through a PR campaign.
There is nothing that makes us happier as PR professionals than a client that wants a relevant, bold, out-of-the-box idea to attract the right audience to their website. Here at Hallam, we pride ourselves on our creativity and our ability to craft compelling narratives that resonate with our clients' brands. Through our tailored PR campaigns, we strive to position our clients as industry leaders and drive meaningful engagement with their target demographics.
I'm a huge fan of foundation links. If we have a new website that has no history and we're limited in resources, we want to build those foundation links through citations, social profiles, press releases, guest posts, Quora, and other social signals.
The great thing about these methods is that they’re absolutely safe and are an amazing foundation for further link building.
If you have an established site with DR>70, you don’t need to spend time building those. You can be much more surgical and really strategical about the links you want to get and which pages you want to push.
What percentage of your SEO budget is currently dedicated to link building?
less then 5
5-15
15-30
30-50
>50
Can't say, I work with multiple clients
A lot of respondents dedicate a relatively small portion of their SEO budget to link building. Only 7.1% allocate over 50%, while 16.8% spend between 5 and 15%, and 17.7% fall within the 15-30% range. Additionally, 18.6% spend less than 5%.
It’s worth mentioning that our survey respondents primarily represent established companies. These companies usually require fewer resources dedicated specifically to link building due to their existing reputation and established library of quality content.
Which industries do you think are the hardest and the easiest to build links for?
Bill Gaule
Carmen Domínguez Rodríguez
Braden Becker
Jules Davies
The difficulty of building backlinks tends to correlate with the difficulty of ranking in a certain industry.
For many in local SEO, a few simple links can have a big effect. For example, a link insertion on another local site and some basic citation links can get many local businesses onto page 1 for their target keyword (assuming everything else is optimized accordingly).
The same can't be said for something more competitive like SaaS.
Although there are exceptions.
For example, marketing and SEO are competitive fields to rank in. However it’s easier to build a personal brand in these fields in respect to other industries. And a strong brand = natural backlinks.
Of course, it takes a lot of work to build a personal brand, but it’s a big industry with lots of other marketers conscious of E-E-A-T. And so many marketers and writers want to quote other experts in their content. Whereas other industries that are ‘less SEO & content Savvy’ are less likely to do this.
The financial industry proves to be one of the most notoriously difficult to build links for — and for a good reason. Whether you’re launching a new campaign or sending expert commentary, financial journalists are always going to be extremely sceptical about publishing your data, as they go through a very extensive process of verifying it. Especially when writing about stocks, journalists need to be careful to give impartiality and an equal voice to multiple spokespeople whilst also making sure to provide the public with enough information.
One of the easiest industries to build links for is definitely travel. It’s very easy for a PR professional to create a good data set for a journalist who might not have the time to do the same. Especially because there are so many key dates in the year relevant to the travel industry — for example, during peak summer travel times, Christmas, or when people search for ‘hot holidays’ in January, it is easy to find a newsworthy angle to every travel piece we want to write.
In terms of one’s own DR, no. There are plenty of better metrics by which to measure link building effectiveness that marketers have more control over: position 1-10 rankings, impressions, and even conversion rates to indicate the new traffic you’re driving is valuable (and therefore you’re building links on the right types of websites).
In terms of your target sites’ DR, then yes, to an extent. I would build links from a relevant domain in spite of low DR, but I wouldn’t build links from a high DR domain in spite of irrelevance. That being said, just because Google doesn’t endorse domain rating doesn’t mean it’s a useless number. I like using DR to prioritize (or disqualify) opportunities if I’ve pre-determined multiple prospects are equally relevant to my business.
In a SaaS context, typically building links is easiest when your brand is in a well-developed vertical such as Sales tech, Mark tech, HR tech... etc. due to the larger amount of actively involved brands invested in their SEO with who you can build relationships with.
On the flip side, industries that are hard to build links for would be examples such as CBD & Crypto. Even though these niches aren't "illegal" or anything, they are often associated with a "grey" area.
This makes acquiring links much more difficult as often these verticals are on the "ban list" in terms of vetting criteria of internal SEO teams.
Hunter.io is the clear favorite among SEO experts and marketers, with 37.2% using it as their primary email finder. Less popular but still frequently used options include Apollo.io (7.1%), Rocketreach.co (6.2%), and Snov.io (6.2%).
A notable one-third of respondents report not using any email finder tool.
Best link-building outreach tool?
I don't use any
BuzzStream
Pitchbox
The vast majority of respondents (51.3%) don't use a dedicated tool for link-building outreach. Of those who do, BuzzStream (12.4%) and Pitchbox (11.5%) are the most popular choices. Less common options include BuzzSumo, Mailshake, and Respona.
Best all-in-one SEO tool?
Ahrefs
Semrush
Other
SE Ranking
Ahrefs dominates as the preferred all-in-one SEO tool, with an overwhelming 64.6% of votes. Semrush comes in second with 24.8%.
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you assess the impact of links?
1: 0.9%
2: 0.9%
3: 1.8%
4: 9.7%
5: 13.3%
6: 16.8%
7: 18.6%
8: 19.5%
9: 5.3%
10: 13.3%
SEO professionals generally consider links to have a significant impact on search engine rankings. On a scale of 1 to 10 (with 10 being the highest impact), the average rating is around 8.
The majority (58.4%) believe links have a significant impact, with scores in the 7-10 range. Only 3.6% of respondents consider links to have a minimal impact on search engine rankings.
Do you use Google Disavow tools currently?
Yes
No
There's a significant difference in Google Disavow tool usage: 69% of respondents don't use them, while only 31% do.
Do you think the role of links is going to change significantly in the near future? If so, how?
Patrick Stox
Peter Rota
Miriam Ellis
Christopher Hofman Laursen
Mickey Aharony
Esteve Castells
Travis Tallent
For a while, I was convinced that links would continue to be less important over time. However, with the rise of generative AI content, I now believe the opposite. When anyone can easily create basic content, links become an important differentiator to help determine what content is actually good and popular.
The more polluted the SERPs become with AI-generated content, the more links from authentic sources will matter as a means for searchers to navigate the information they need.
We are all seeing the trend of searchers turning to platforms like Reddit trying to get real information from real people. In this scenario, some of your most valuable links (in terms of discovery and conversions) could stem from social platforms, special interest groups, and other human-centric online gatherings where authenticity is valued.
Go where you are needed, participate in what you love, share your expertise, and help others in real ways. They will recommend you (and often link to you) when the time comes.
Links will only become a stronger signal to Google to help them rank sites. Content is discounted with the rise of AI, so how do you navigate, if everyone can generate 10X or 100X content?
That being said, quality in link building is key. When it comes to getting the right links, PR and SEO departments need to merge. Today we have two silos. While SEOs surely have a difficult time grasping the concept of quality content with the potential to go viral, PR people also need to adopt a new skill set.
The fact is they never really understood the importance of link building. That's a shame and I think we will see hybrids grasping both disciplines.
I believe backlinks will become less essential to Google's ranking algorithm due to Google's shift towards Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) and Search Generative Experience (SGE). These prioritize trusted, reliable information generated by AI engines. The emphasis in SEO will begin to shift from legacy factors like backlinks and number of mentions towards more reliable, trusted information contained within the content itself.
Hence, Google will likely place more weight on the reliability and veracity of your content — specifically verbatim quotes from it — than backlinks. So, while backlinks might still matter, their impact may diminish.
To adapt, focus on content quality and create original video content. Video content is growing in importance and is likely to remain so with GEO and SGE.
I think it will remain important as backlinks are the way Google maps out authority across the web. But at the same time with the arrival of AI, it might change a bit and become less important since LLMs might not factor in the same type of metric and they might use other ones.
Yes, links have already changed! Think of how affiliate links and unlinked mentions are treated today vs. a few years ago. I believe links will become less critical, while PR will remain essential for proving topical authority.
Suspicion runs high, with 92% of survey respondents believing their competitors engage in link buying practices.
Do you think small businesses can compete with large companies? How can small businesses compete with larger companies in link building?
Bill Gaule
Aaron Rudman-Hawkins
Erika Varangouli
Abi Bennetts
Lazarina Stoy
Joshua Squires
Samy Ben Sadok
Sam Cant
Naomi Francis-Parker
James Taylor
Vivian Hoang
The difficulty of building backlinks tends to correlate with the difficulty of ranking in a certain industry.
For many in local SEO, a few simple links can have a big effect. For example, a link insertion on another local site and some basic citation links can get many local businesses onto page 1 for their target keyword (assuming everything else is optimized accordingly).
The same can't be said for something more competitive like SaaS.
Although there are exceptions.
For example, marketing and SEO are competitive fields to rank in. However it’s easier to build a personal brand in these fields in respect to other industries. And a strong brand = natural backlinks.
Of course, it takes a lot of work to build a personal brand, but it’s a big industry with lots of other marketers conscious of E-E-A-T. And so many marketers and writers want to quote other experts in their content. Whereas other industries that are ‘less SEO & content Savvy’ are less likely to do this.
Smaller brands can beat larger companies by focusing their efforts on specific topics that are most relevant and where they feel they can add the most value.
All too often brands try and be all things to all people. Go narrow and deep, reinforce your E-E-A-T with consistency via content and links, do that and you can outperform larger companies with relative ease. We've done this countless times over the years.
Anyone with subject matter expertise and first-hand experience can establish thought leadership on social media. It takes time, but it doesn't require big budgets or teams behind it.
The press and the rest of the niche publishers prefer to feature experts. And big enterprises and corporations are notoriously bad at having senior leaders establish thought leadership (for various reasons). This is only one way in which your small business can benefit. The benefits go beyond just SEO or links — you can attract customers.
There's no reason why small businesses can't compete with larger companies when it comes to great link-building and digital PR tactics — in fact, small businesses often possess an advantage over lots of big businesses.
Small businesses are much more agile and have the ability to move a lot quicker when it comes to getting sign off on ideas. Generally, smaller businesses have less 'red tape' meaning there are fewer people working in that business who need to sign off an idea or PR comment, allowing smaller companies to jump on trends in the media a lot quicker.
From reacting to industry changes to jumping on a trend which is circulating in popular media, small businesses are much better equipped to act quickly and beat competitors to a journalist’s inbox. Not only this, but smaller businesses often also have fewer protective guidelines around brand voice, and the types of conversations the brand can be contributing to — allowing small companies to offer more direct advice and opinion on relevant topics, which journalists love, and adds real value to reading audiences too.
In addition, lots of small businesses also operate in more niche industries, or offer one singular service or product to consumers, versus big companies who offer many different products or services at once. This is beneficial because small businesses can hone in on their specialized expertise, and use these expert insights to participate in industry conversations and help consumers.
For example, creating an expert-led report that contains specialized insights and internal data is a great way to gain links from consumer and trade publications alike. Or for a more reactive approach, small businesses could pass comment on recent industry or wider economic changes and explain exactly how this relates to and impacts their industry and customers.
Journalists are always looking for different kinds of specialist experts, and by leaning into your business' niche you can land high authority links on relevant publications, place your challenger brand name in publications larger company competitors are usually seen in, and garner both major brand awareness as well as mega SEO impact.
Small businesses can compete with larger companies by creating linkable resources and investing in original research. Think of assets like infographics, small-scale niche-specific industry reports, and user research. Another successful tactic is building web-hosted tools, that are task-specific, product/service/brand-relevant, and highly useful to users. Such tools, when hosted on their websites, can be great for link acquisition and are often easier for small companies to execute without the long and hefty approval procedures, which typically burden larger organizations from publishing innovative solutions on their sites.
Small businesses may not be able to compete with the total number of links large businesses can generate, but they can compete on relevance. Focusing on building links at the local level through local affiliate news and community sites, in addition to relevant topical websites, can help smaller sites rank for the most relevant searches especially when there's overlap with the searcher's location.
Link building itself isn't a strategy, it's an outcome of many bespoke workstreams working together to drive relevant coverage and natural links to a website. Large companies can sometimes just rely on their market authority to drive natural links to their content, but for a small brand, this may not be feasible unless you're incredibly niche.
Keep up with your link hygiene and broken link reclamation, yes. But also make sure you're creating new, fresh, and interesting content to outreach to the media. Ensure you have a hook — for instance, a unique view on relevant data or new self-sourced data even, so that journalists and content creators will have much more reason to feature you in their content.
The main things are: keep trying new techniques, learn from what doesn't work, and continuously improve your process. Link building and digital PR is a long-term workstream, but your results will pay dividends down the line!
Small businesses need to focus on relevancy and expertise. Every business will have experts within the company who have unique insights that will enhance their audience's experience and add value to their decision-making process. Utilize this expertise and share it in relevant press and online publications.
The great thing about this approach is that it can be done on any level and many big businesses overlook their own expertise in favor of more 'attractive' prospects like buying links. Champion your own expertise and you'll be onto a winner!
I think you need to use the layers of approval that larger businesses often have as a tool for reactive digital PR link building. If you as a small business owner have a response to provide to a journalist quickly, then do it!
Larger businesses often don't have the luxury of being able to provide a quick reaction without layers of sign-off, so you can use a rapid turnaround approach to your benefit for both journalist requests and reactive digital PR link building.
In previous roles, I've worked with link builders, creating guest posts, linkable assets, etc. I think focusing on your target audience and building useful content that others will want to link to will continue to be the winning, scalable, and sustainable strategy.
Do you consider link building to be the most challenging part of SEO?
Yes
No
SEO professionals are almost evenly split on whether link building is the hardest part of SEO. While slightly more than half (52.2%) don't think it's the most challenging, a significant portion (47.8%) do. Clearly, link building remains a complex and hotly debated topic within the SEO community.
Do you believe link building is one of the most difficult things in SEO? If so, why?
Samy Thuillier
Connor Gillivan
David Carrasco Pamies
Bibi
Natasha Burtenshaw-deVries
Let's cut to the chase. Yes, link building is the most thankless, arduous task in the SEO game, and I'll give you 3 reasons why:
1. Time sink with a gambling twist. You’ll pour endless hours into crafting emails and churning out quality content, for what? The hope that someone bites and gives you that backlink. It’s a colossal time investment, and the ROI is a roll of the dice. You’re at the mercy of Google’s whims. One day your backlink is the golden ticket; the next, it’s as if it never existed. The unpredictability of Google’s affection for your link-building efforts turns it into a high-stakes gamble with your time and sanity.
2. Quality over quantity is almost a fantasy. Google’s preaching about quality backlinks. So, you’re expected to play detective, hunting down these reputable sites willing to link back to you. You need to court and woo these sites, hoping they deem you worthy. It’s a mad dash for digital approval that’s sometimes exhausting.
3. Penalty roulette. Step out of line just a tad, and BAM, Google’s ready with a penalty, knocking your site down a peg or twenty. It’s like walking through a minefield blindfolded. One wrong step, one link deemed “unnatural,” and your site's visibility is obliterated. You’re constantly playing it safe, but even then, there are no guarantees. The rules of the game are changing with the wind, and it’s your job to keep up or face the consequences.
So, there you have it. Link building is the most difficult part of SEO because it’s a relentless, often futile, endeavor that can drive you mad. It’s a necessary evil in this line of work, one we all love to hate.
I don't believe so. It's clear that link building has evolved over the last few years and has become more complicated. It's no longer a simple 2+2 with a checklist from a manual. But, what SEO practice isn't complex these days? It's true that it might be more difficult to identify and achieve quick wins, and there is generally more uncertainty, but there is also a methodology that we can follow.
However, I think that link building has certain unique characteristics that set it apart from other disciplines within SEO. For example, I believe it requires a combination of analytical and creative skills to develop a truly effective strategy. That can be more challenging to achieve. Additionally, it might be an area with more uncertainty, less information, and fewer tools that provide quantifiable data. This complicates matters. Finally, I believe the negative aura that always seems to follow it doesn't help, making it a more closed field than other areas.
I'm not sure! I've never been a tech-savvy SEO, so I can't say if those tasks are harder or easier.
BUT, I do hear from many on-site SEOs that mastering the basics makes a huge difference. In link building, though, basic methods get copied, scaled, and eventually die off.
Following that idea, link building might be tougher because you often need to find creative tweaks or change your approach completely.
Plus, you're dealing with real humans like editors and journalists, which adds another layer of complexity.
Link building is definitely one of the most difficult parts of SEO, especially for new websites or one without a well-established brand. Quality links can be hard to find when the "easy" opportunities are often just link farms in disguise and smaller publishers, which can be more likely to provide links to their content, have often shut down or are bought up by massive media companies where links can be harder to come by.
It can also be hard to prove the impact on ROI for link building which can make it difficult to get buy-in and investment in it.
Email proves the major link-building source, with 45.1% of respondents relying on it as their main method. A significant 23% prioritize building links through communities and partnerships. Additionally, some SEO professionals find success using platforms like LinkedIn, Slack, and others.
Main source you use for link building?
Jakub Rudnik
Alina Tytarenko
Limor Barenholtz
Amanda Johnson
Lee Moskowitz
Maria Rozhdestvenskaia
I'd recommend trading or swapping links, assuming you have a moderate-to-high domain authority. Link building can be done organically, and sometimes you can build links from folks who don't know the value you're getting. But typically it's a transaction for both parties. So don't be shy about giving a link of value in return for your own link. And if you find a great partner, work with them repeatedly.
I guess that outreach would be the #1 strategy in general for getting good links (unlike buying bad links). Like creating some high-quality/sharable content and reaching out to relevant sites individually with your content, or targeting websites and approaching them with content suggestions that will add value to their readers.
I'll acknowledge my bias here because I'm a content-led SEO expert, but creating the best, most well-researched content in your industry or niche is the best way to organically earn links in a sustainable, lasting manner. Do research, create new data and insights, and the links will come.
Does this take more time? Yes. But I've worked for sites that have done incredibly well without a backlink strategy at all if their content-led SEO is superb. Good content, and sharing it through multiple channels, earns high-quality links in its own right. Through this method, I've had high-authority sites in competing spaces approach me for organic link swaps.
A secondary approach to creating good content is healthy, quality digital PR in your industry niche, along with manual outreach to other site owners for link swaps in your topic. Concentrate on earning quality links with sites related to your site's area of topical authority, rather than focusing on quantity.
Content-led SEO strategist, Sr. Marketing Manager at
My biggest recommendation for newcomers isn't about tools or tactics, it's about people! As SEOs and marketers, we can get so caught up in the technical stuff that we forget to consider the human behind the computer. Make it a point to connect and network with content writers, who are often the unsung heroes of getting meaningful backlinks. Engage with them in a way that shows you're trying to help them AND that you know what you're talking about.
Content writers are hit with many AI-generated pitches from fake subject matter experts. When you engage with writers and actually provide what they are looking for, you'll stand out and they will appreciate you. Not only will they be more likely to include your backlink, but they may continue to reach out to you in the future.
In short, connect with content writers, be a nice person, and make their job easier by providing the information they want to include!
It's not necessarily a link-building technique, but my advice for newcomers is this: before prioritizing anything else, put effort into creating content that people would naturally want to reference and link to. Creating high-quality, unique content lays a foundation for attracting links organically over time.
At Databox, we've found that original research we conduct and publish on our blog works wonders. People find our content valuable because of data and insights they can’t find anywhere else, and link to our reports naturally, without the need for constant outreach.
Which SEO tool provides comprehensive backlink data?
Ahrefs
Semrush
Majestic
SEranking
Moz
Once again, Ahrefs stands out as the clear favorite for comprehensive backlinks data, with a dominant 74.3% of respondents selecting it. Other popular choices include Semrush, Majestic, SE Ranking, and Moz.
Do you make an effort to get nofollow links?
Yes
No
Nearly half (46.9%) of respondents actively pursue nofollow links. The data proves that the large number of SEO experts recognizes the value of nofollow links for creating a well-rounded link profile.
What’s the role of nofollow links in the link-building strategy?
Sujith Nair
Evaldas Mockus
Tomas Prochazka
Robbie Richards
Julia-Carolin Zeng
Lisa Kubatzki
Nofollow links are the identity of any natural and diversified link profile. A link builder would always try to grab a dofollow link at any given day and as these links with higher SEO juice get accumulated, the link profile will automatically start looking unnatural. We do need nofollow links to keep the balance.
So does that mean nofollow links are only meant to keep the profile off the spam list? Of course not, While nofollow links might not pass authority directly, they emphasize user experience and content quality. High-quality, relevant nofollow links from authoritative sources like Wikipedia can still signal topical relevance and user trust, indirectly influencing rankings.
Being an SEO professional, I create processes for building nofollow links for certain page types to increase topical authority. After all, traffic is not the only jackpot.
We don’t focus a lot on that. Unless nofollow links are from very high authority websites and might bring not only SEO link juice but also brand awareness and traffic.
It can help clean up your off-page profile. it also helps strengthen your authority, especially for younger websites it's highly recommended to acquire those links.
Nofollow links certainly still have a place in a link-building campaign. With the emergence of AI and its future impact on search results, brand signals are going to be really important. Strong brand citations, linked or unlinked, will still present valuable signals to search engines that could positively impact SGE performance.
Nofollow links are not inferior to follow links. In my opinion, Google treats them equally these days. What I find important when analyzing a client’s backlink profile is that there is a good ratio between follow and nofollow links. If there are significantly more follow than nofollow links, it makes the whole backlink profile look unnatural, and I usually take a closer look to see if black hat techniques were used in the past. If there are significantly more nofollow than follow links, the backlink profile might need some diversification in the type of publication links are coming from.
All of that will only guide future link-building efforts and does not usually lead to disavows. I have not seen a link-related ranking drop in years and have not seen the need to update disavow files in a long time.
Think of nofollow links as mentions and traffic drivers. If you get a nofollow link on a very reputable site with lots of traffic in your niche, possibly even a brand mention, it’s one of the best scenarios that can happen to you. It will increase awareness about your brand and (in the best cases) drive referral traffic. Okay, maybe the link won’t have a direct impact on your rankings, but if it draws attention to your brand/site/article, this can’t help but be a good signifier for Google.
AI will revolutionize the industry by the end of this year. Fractl's product, LedeTime, exemplifies how a decade's worth of industry expertise can be distilled into an AI system that streamlines list building, pitch strategy, and outreach, rivaling the capabilities of a Digital PR Executive in minutes. This technological advancement allows professionals to allocate more time to critical human-centric tasks such as journalist relationship building and strategic campaign planning, while simultaneously scaling their number of effective targeted pitches and placements. Early adopters of such AI tools are set to outperform their competition by leveraging these efficiencies to gain a pronounced advantage in the market.
How many high quality backlinks can one person build per month?
Less than 5: 14.2%
25-30: 5.3%
5-10: 16.8%
30-35: 6.2%
10-15: 23%
35-40: 1.8%
15-20: 14.2%
>40: 9.7%
20-25: 8.8%
Building links at scale takes considerable effort and expertise. The majority of respondents (54%) build between 5 and 20 high-quality backlinks per month. While some achieve higher numbers, it's important to prioritize quality over quantity.
How should one estimate the number of links they should secure to achieve their goals?
Evaldas Mockus
Lauren Funaro
Limor Barenholtz
Chloe Chiang
Lauryna Kirjanove
Pablo García
We don’t focus a lot on that. Unless nofollow links are from very high authority websites and might bring not only SEO link juice but also brand awareness and traffic.
In my experience, the volume of links matters much less than the quality of links. "Quality," in this case describes the referring domain's traffic, domain authority, topical authority (this one is often missed, but has a huge impact), and the anchor text you use.
For example, we had a page skyrocket in traffic based on four links. I also want to point out that the page itself was set up for success: optimized for SEO and helpful content, strong foundation of interlinking, etc.
I guess that outreach would be the #1 strategy in general for getting good links (unlike buying bad links). Like creating some high-quality/sharable content and reaching out to relevant sites individually with your content, or targeting websites and approaching them with content suggestions that will add value to their readers.
For businesses, whether you are agency-side or in-house, the focus shouldn’t be about the number of links but rather the quality of links.
If you gain 1,000 backlinks but all of them are PBNs or come from spammy websites (which Google has started penalizing heavily with the last 3 HCU updates), none of them will make an impact on your SEO efforts.
Whereas if you were only able to gain one high-quality backlink through digital PR or even HARO link building, and the article is niche-relevant, has good traffic coming towards it, and is dofollow — that has a much greater impact than buying 1,000s of links.
Additionally, link building shouldn’t be a siloed, individual practice — it NEEDS to tie in with your technical, on-page/onsite SEO strategies, too.
Link building should supplement everything you’re doing on your website, NOT be an individual strategy or the sole strategy.
So to evaluate whether the links acquired were successful in achieving your goals, think of the following:
1. Is it niche relevant? (E.g. the context of the link — if you’re a healthcare website getting a link writing about cars and automotive, there’s no correlation)
2. Is the website credible?
3. Does the website have good-quality content? NOT purely AI-generated, NOT keyword stuffed?
4. Does the website you’re linking from have good traffic?
5. What is the anchor text used? Does it match with your campaign goals? Does it read naturally?
6. Is the link dofollow? If not, is there an option to change it to a dofollow?
Most people talk about DR/DA, but these are just vanity metrics. They’re good at reviewing websites at a glance but as SEOs, you need to dig deeper and analyze the questions above to see if a backlink you’re gaining is truly valuable to achieve your goals.
To gauge the number of links necessary to achieve your objectives, you need to examine your competitors' tactics.
We analyze competitors' backlinks profiles and identify the gaps between competitors' and our backlinks. Also, we utilize the "Link intersection" tool to see which sites are linking to your competitors but not to you. And voila! We estimated the number of links we should secure to achieve our goals!
But the most important thing to mention — while quantity is important, prioritize the quality and relevance of your backlinks. We always concentrate on securing links from authoritative sites within our niche to bolster our rankings and attract valuable traffic.
The number of links you need to rank for a highly competitive keyword depends on the competitive landscape for that keyword, and you should establish a benchmark by looking at the current top competitors.
You can apply this to your SEO projects by using a tool like the Ahrefs toolbar to analyze the backlink profile for the top-raking results in the SERP for a keyword you want to optimize.
On top of this, consider that if your site has generally lower authority than your competitors (a “David versus Goliath” optimization), you may require more high-quality referring domains to see results in a more mature competitive landscape.
Is it possible to rank high on Google solely through quality content, without relying on backlinks?
Yes
No
A resounding 71.1% of SEO professionals believe it's possible to achieve high Google rankings with quality content alone.
How do links impact a site’s search performance?
Samantha North
Amanda Walls
Maeva Cifuentes
Benjamin Strusnik
Mark Williams-Cook
Of course, links have a positive effect on a site’s search performance, but with a couple of caveats.
First, they need to come from a quality site that’s not a link farm specifically designed to sell links.
Second, that site should also be highly relevant to the topic of your target page and preferably the overall site. These two factors will maximize the beneficial effect of link building.
It’s definitely possible to get on the front page without deliberately building links. I’ve done this myself.
The trick is:
1) target low-competition keywords where you can see sites with low DR/DA already ranking on page one.
2) study the keyword’s search intent in detail so your article gives the searcher exactly what they want and does it quickly. None of those long-winded introductions! Aim to answer the search intent better than any other competitor on the front page.
Links play an important role in building a brand, creating a positive reputation, getting people to talk about your brand and product, and sending positive trust signals towards your website — all key contributors to your website's performance.
What you say about yourself can help to start the trust narrative, but what other people say about you through content on their site which links back to you or cites your experts, plays a significant role in building those all-important E-E-A-T signals and showcasing positive reputation signals across the board.
I'd always start with on-site SEO: content, technical, and on-page. If you aren't matching search intent with great content of the right type, no number of links will save you.
But sometimes, you've exhausted everything you can do and all the boxes are checked, and you're still not in the top 3 positions. If this is the case across the board and you don't have 50% of your target keywords in the top 10 positions, you'll need to build links.
In this case, you'll see rankings move up much faster, and you'll thereby increase CTR, traffic, and hopefully revenue if you've chosen the right topics. We've managed to get to the first page without building links, but it's usually earlier on when we're not yet going for very competitive topics.
As someone who's been in SEO and ranking my own as well as my client's Shopify websites I can say that the links are more of an amplifier than anything else.
Let's say you have great content, on-page SEO, technical SEO, and lots of pages targeting high-converting keywords that match search intent.
Pair that with some GREAT referral traffic from paid media efforts, and you'll see that the need for building links, isn't as high as everyone makes it out to be...
But this mainly applies to low-medium competition niches.
When you enter highly competitive SEO niches, you'll quickly notice that the game is quite a lot different and that it ultimately all comes down to the quality of your backlinks.
In regards to what kind of links you want to build, I'd suggest you should always try and build links that are VERY difficult for others to get/recreate, as that will allow you to have a bulletproof SEO strategy, making it much more difficult for your competitors to replicate.
I believe links are used across the board with other systems. Part of the concept of E-E-A-T I believe has to do with links and I am convinced there is a link-based element to the recent HCU classifier. From my observations, sites with poor branding or too few links seem to have suffered whereas other sites with a stronger link profile and brand have excelled with very similar content.
As to not ranking with links, it's definitely been possible (if not very easy) until recently, with sites using programmatic SEO to target longtail searches, a lot of the time with AI — however, this is exactly the type of site we're seeing Google aggressively go after.